- BITLOCKER MAC COMPATIBILITY FOR MAC
- BITLOCKER MAC COMPATIBILITY UPDATE
- BITLOCKER MAC COMPATIBILITY FULL
- BITLOCKER MAC COMPATIBILITY WINDOWS
Hasleo BitLocker Anywhere For Mac is a free download and ALL-IN-ONE BitLocker solution for macOS. Hasleo BitLocker Anywhere For Mac Screenshot Version: 8.4
BITLOCKER MAC COMPATIBILITY UPDATE
Apple didn't update Legacy mode to use standard Intel EFI.Hasleo BitLocker Anywhere For Mac is a software allows you to mount, read and write BitLocker-encrypted drives in macOS, and you can use it encrypt drives with BitLocker, decrypt and change password for BitLocker-encrypted drives.
BITLOCKER MAC COMPATIBILITY WINDOWS
Now that I think about it more, maybe that 3TB disk size limitation is only in "Legacy/BIOS Emulation" mode for when you want to dual-boot to Windows or Linux. If i'm correct, you might be able to use a 3TB drive, but you won?t be able to partition more than 2/3rds of it. (I?m sure if I?m wrong someone will correct me). Just be aware that so far as I know even the newer Sandy Bridge level Mac's are limited to 2TB drives (dunno for sure not supporting any at this time) unless they adopted at least part of Intel?s EFI v2, Mac's are stuck at a max of 2TB with the current generation. If you care enough about your data to encrypt it, you should probably be synching with another encrypted drive for at least one backup, and that "other" drive you can use TrueCrypt/exFAT on for cross-platform compatibility. Honestly, do yourself a favor and buy yourself another drive. Just as a warning, if practially any errors happen while using GParted, all data on the partition being modified is likely toast. exFAT (FAT64) does not have the 4gig file size limitation. At best once you've stripped encryption off the drive you can use something like the GParted live distribution CD to boot to Linux and convert the drive from NTFS to FAT32 so long as none of your files are larger than 4 gigs and the partition is no too large that FAT32 doesn't support it. (Vista/XP can be capable of reading exFAT if the right updates are applied).Įither way, if you eventually need to change the format of the disk away from NTFS, your best bet is to find a way to get all your data off it and then repartition. If you need backwards compatibility at all with anything younger than OS-X 10.6, do not use exFAT. If you need your drive to work properly on both OS-X and Windows 7, reformat it to exFAT (also known as FAT64, but not to Windows or OS-X) otherwise your probably best off keeping it formatted for the OS the drive will most commonly run under (likely HFS+ if you?ll only be using it on a Mac from now on).
BITLOCKER MAC COMPATIBILITY FULL
OS-X 10.7 gains native full disk encryption via FileVault, but it presently lacks native ability, and as BitLocker is limited to Windows FileVault will be limited to OS-X. Otherwise, if you need full disk encryption under OS-X right this moment, I believe your only real option is TrueCrypt (open source free) or PGP (commercial/not free). If you can add full encryption back without reformatting using TrueCrypt, then that's good.
Since you've said you don't have enough space for just the files, your easiest solution to use the drive on multiple platforms is to just put the drive on a Vista/7 system and disable BitLocker to remove the encryption without removing your data. Also, I?d strongly discourage using TrueCrypt over BitLocker on bootable volumes, especially of your hardware contains a TPM or you utilize Active Directory. If you don?t already have a good backup of your data encrypted on another disk, I?d recommend it. I have not had this issue with BitLocker, but I have seen it a long time ago with TrueCrypt, and it?s unplesent.
Just be warned, as I recall, recovering from corruption with TrueCrypt is very difficult if not impossible (probably depends on the type of corruption). I don't recall if TrueCrypt can encrypt a volume without reformatting it though I haven't used it for full disk encryption since Vista was released. As I recall, by default they use the same cipher strength, and both use AES as the primary encryption form. TrueCrypt is, to my knowledge, as secure as BitLocker. If you wish to use full disk encryption between Windows and OS-X, you will need to disable BitLocker and move to open source TrueCrypt 7a which is multiplatform.
0 kommentar(er)
